Résumé de recherche
With several commercially available devices measuring respiratory impedance by oscillometry, the agreement between values obtained on different instruments or frequencies remains unclear. Our aim was to examine the agreement between resistance and reactance parameters on two oscillometry instruments using different waveforms.
We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study in asthmatic children aged 3–17 years. Reproducible oscillometry measurements were obtained in random order, by blinded operators, at three modes: 5–10–15–20–25 Hz (5–25 Hz) multifrequency mode on the MasterScreen impulse oscillometry system, and both 5–25 Hz multifrequency mode and 7 Hz monofrequency on the tremoFlo C-100 airwave sinusoidal system. Resistance, reactance and within-breath parameters were examined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), paired t-test, linear regression and Bland–Altman method.
Of 50 participants, 44 and 38 completed between-device and within-frequency measurements, respectively. Between-device measurements at 5–25 Hz showed high (ICC 0.88–0.91) and good (ICC 0.69–0.87) agreement in resistance and reactance, respectively, but with an absolute within-patient difference (≥0.05 kPa·L−1·s−1) and proportional bias (≥30% per kPa·L−1·s−1) in all parameters and oscillatory frequencies, apart from resistance at 5 Hz. A significant proportional bias was documented in most within-breath parameters at 5 versus 7 Hz on tremoFlo.
Observed differences in resistance and reactance suggest the need for instrument- and frequency-specific paediatric normative values.